Re: Any progress with FIS GT.M?
On 04/24/2012 04:19 PM, Ean Schuessler wrote:
I've spent a little time trying out the builds from GIT. I'm just a baby
with GT.M and haven't really done any significant development with it.
About the most I could hope to do is *maybe* figure something out with
the 32 bit symbol name problems but I wouldn't bet the house on me
getting it done.
[KSB] Since the upstream source tarball builds on 32-bit platforms, maybe
try in two directories one with the Git source and one with the upstream
tarball source? Once you have a build, I would be happy to show you how
to validate it quickly.
Regards
-- Bhaskar
On 04/24/12 03:01, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
the mail below is the last one in my folder about GT.M progress.
Meanwhile Ean whoed interest and somebody else I unfortunately forgot
but whom I did directed to Luis. I'm a bit concerned about the progress
of packaging. My estimated schedule to bring FIS GT.M into next stable
Debian was beginning of May which is pretty close - too close
considering the silence about this. Could you please give a status
update? For me silence means "no problems occured" - otherwise I hopes
to have teached in the MoM period to pop up here and ask for help. But
no problems also occure if there is no work at all. Please, pretty
please keep on working on this goal or let us know how we can help to
reach it.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
GT.M - Rock solid. Lightning fast. Secure. No compromises.
_____________
The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.
Reply to: