Re: FastQC read for testing (Was: Some (minimal?) Java help needed)
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Andreas Tille <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> In short:
> 1. use uscan from
> to get the original tarball I used
> 2. if this fails please send full build log (or make it accessible
> 3. lets consider using Git if problems remain
> Thanks for working on this
This did the trick. I was able to build this package after using the
new uscan, totally didn't read the comment inside debian/rules before.
I'll be testing the resulting binary with real data tomorrow. I'll
share the results.
Regarding migrating to git, I would love if that's the case. I managed
to write down a nice workflow for updating git packages and for
submitting then to launchpad. It takes me almost no time in most case.
I will be using fastqc often enough that I would be happy to help
keeping it updated.