[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: InVesalius 3 Beta



On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 04:19:27PM -0300, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote:
>> > Good to know that. We are planing to put all c/c++ lib we've been
>> > developing inside a folder in InVesalius.
>>
>> I've just seen the message from Andreas Tille. For some reason, the
>> email with his message wasn't to me.
>
> The reason why the mail was not explicitely send to your e-mail was most
> probably that I blindly followed general debian mailing list policy to
> *not* CC posters because it is simply assumed that people are subscribed
> to the list.  I try to respect that newcomers might not do this and try
> to remember CCing them - but I might blindly fall back to the policy by
> simply forgetting this caution.

Subscribed.

>> Andreas, you are suggesting me to package "Context aware smoothing"
>> (ca_smoothing to the close friends :) ) ?
>
> Yes!
>
>> As We, InVesalius'
>> developers, are planing to put all C/C++ libs together with InVesalius
>> code (inside a proper folder) in the following versions, don't you
>> think it's better to provide a copy of ca_smoothing inside the
>> invesalius***.orig.tar.gz, like Mathieu suggested?
>
> I do not think that this was an explicite suggestion of Mathieu - he
> just intended to write what would be possible / acceptable packaging
> wise.  It is definitely no good packaging practice to use convinience
> copies of some code which is developed somewhere else as in the source
> tree of the project in question.  In Debian we try hard to modularise
> software and to not duplicate code.  Just assume ca_smoothing could be
> used by some other imaging project.

Ok. A question: Do you think it's better to split the package in
libcasmoothing and python-casmoothing or only python-casmoothing?

> Kind regards
>
>        Andreas.
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de

Thanks!


Reply to: