Re: Splitting imaging into two separate tasks
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 10:11:35AM +0200, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> > > This is rather arbitrary.
> > >
> > > Medicine can be divided into Care and Research. Both need microscopic
> > > as well as macroscopic imaging.
> >
> > So this is a vote against spliting the imaging task because you think
> > all these applications tend to be installed on the very same machine and
> > in medicine the specialisation to certain fields is not that harsh?
>
> This is what I think, not a vote. Basically what I'm saying is that
> the split between micro- and macroscopic imaging is not necessarily useful.
>
> A primary split between Practice and Research would be much more useful
> (to me).
We are heavily interested in what is useful to you because you are one
of the few doctors who are quite verbose on our list. Unfortunately I
can not yet make any practical sense out of your suggestion. Would you
mind giving some example dependencies for metapackages which would you
personally consider as helpful.
> (Average) Doctors (as opposed to Medical Scientist who happen to be
> doctors) may find Debian Med somewhere. The moment they cannot easily
> filter Practice from Research releated software they will go away.
So the question is: is med-practice helpful and what other helpful tasks
would you consider (regarding imaging and perhaps other interesting
stuff - I even would not mind creating a med-office with a set of office
tools which might be of specific interest to some extend).
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: