On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:18:34PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 09:53:16PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > >> As such, I think it would be a disservice to our users to force an > >> abrupt transition by uploading ITK 4 and removing ITK 3. Instead, I > >> propose to keep ITK 3.20.1 in Debian and upload a new source package, > >> insighttoolkit4 (or maybe itk4?). > > > > If this is a question to the readers of the list: I'm in favour of the > > shorter name (itk4). Whenever I have read about this library in most > > cases it was referenced as itk only. > > Well, for debian users there will be some confusion: > > $ apt-cache search itk > itk3 - [incr Tk] OOP extension for Tk - run-time files Mathieu, you're right. I keep forgetting about this. > I am ok with libinsighttoolkit3-dev, since I have autocompletion set > to on with my shell. So I'm creating libinsighttoolkit4-dev and friends. -Steve
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature