Re: velvet -> MetaVelvet ?
Um beginner, reporting in!
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:24:28PM +0100, Maximilian Haussler wrote:
>> Isn't the real upstream of meta-velvet here:
>> https://github.com/hacchy/MetaVelvet
>>
>> Based on:
>> http://metavelvet.dna.bio.keio.ac.jp/index.html
>
> Ahh, thanks for the hint.
>
>> Looks like Daniel has a copy of meta-velvet inside velvet now, but I
>> guess that the github site has the newest version...
>
> So the correct thing to do would be either:
>
> - Just strip this useless copy from velvet tarball (because
> we are rebuilding it anyway) or
> - Simply care for not installing the stuff in the binary package
>
> Does anybody think that packaging MetaVelvet makes sense as well. It
> seems that most of the packaging stuff is quite similar to velvet and
> should be a quite reasonable beginners task?
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] 20110405152328.GA2504@an3as.eu">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20110405152328.GA2504@an3as.eu
>
>
Reply to: