Re: velvet -> MetaVelvet ?
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:24:28PM +0100, Maximilian Haussler wrote:
> Isn't the real upstream of meta-velvet here:
> https://github.com/hacchy/MetaVelvet
>
> Based on:
> http://metavelvet.dna.bio.keio.ac.jp/index.html
Ahh, thanks for the hint.
> Looks like Daniel has a copy of meta-velvet inside velvet now, but I
> guess that the github site has the newest version...
So the correct thing to do would be either:
- Just strip this useless copy from velvet tarball (because
we are rebuilding it anyway) or
- Simply care for not installing the stuff in the binary package
Does anybody think that packaging MetaVelvet makes sense as well. It
seems that most of the packaging stuff is quite similar to velvet and
should be a quite reasonable beginners task?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: