Re: question about meme
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 07:24:59PM +0100, Steffen Möller wrote:
> glam2 has found its way to meme only at some later point as it seems. What counts are the source tarballs. When GLAM2 is now
> shipping with it, then I suggest to have a source package called "meme" and several binary packages from it ... if this makes
> sense since there are different user groups. A binary meme package could (if feasible) then depend on / recommend glam2.
>
> The glam2 package of meme would be of a version higher than that of the standalone glam2, so I hope. We then just ask for a
> removal of Glam2 from the archive.
It was me who introduced this split. I considered it useful because we
just have a glam2 package and so it made obviosely sense to have this
code separately. Whether it should remain that way (or you merge back
again) or you even consider to split more parts of the suite separately
is your decision. We have a do-o-cracy and the doer decides what gets
done. I willnot stubbornly insist on my way of packaging of there are
reasons do it in another way.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: