Re: DICOM viewers (Was: Contributing to DebianMed)
> In fact Aeskulap seems to be dead upstream - at least there was no new
> code from upstreams since years. There is another project which is
> perhaps comparable:
>
> http://www.orcero.org/irbis/kradview/
kradview couldn't do what aeskulap was able to do for me last time
I looked. In fact, kradview isn't even installable anymore in a recent
Debian AFAICT which simply kills it as far as GNUmed is concerned.
> So perhaps spending some time into comparing these two projects (I
> personally have no real idea how to compare the features) might make
> sense. If it turns out that kradview is better than Aeskulap we should
> perhaps restart the packaging effort of this
Package an already-dead project because it seems better than an
already-packaged, also-dead project ? Hey, why not :-)
> or even a more reasonable project suggested by
> our medical imaging experts???
There is none that I am aware of that are of interest to GNUmed
(clinical diagnostic radiology viewer rather than scientific imaging).
How about just doing a well described, limited-in-scope
assignment-type project with a known, immediately useful outcome ?
That would be my suggestion anyway.
Karsten
--
GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01
Reply to: