Re: Role of libeazel

[Steffen Moeller <smoesmoesmoe@googlemail.com>]

Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 01:34:08PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
...
> 
>> We should
>> nonetheless prepare for it. I could imagine that both the HMMER and the
>> Infernal packages offer a binary package libeazel-hmmer/libeazel-infernal and
>> that these are given the tag "Provides: libeazel".
>>
>> The problem with this approach is that we have the packaging work twice, the
>> pro is that we don't need to care about the versioning.
> 
> ... and it is probably not worth the effort.

So just submit infernal as it is. Some extra package can be done any time later.

Steffen