Role of libeazel
Hi,
I intend to update the Debian package of infernal to the newest stable
version (1.0). I just noticed that it contains a copy of libeazel. I
became curious about this library because it looked rather like a
separate piece of code. My research enedet up in another copy of this
library in hmmer 3.0b2 with a later time stamp. This makes me curious
whether it makes sense to release this code as separate library tarball
and build both programs, infernal and hmmer, against this library.
>From a software maintenance point of view this makes perfectly sense
and even might enable other projects to profit from the library.
What do you think about this?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Klarmachen zum Ändern!
Reply to: