Re: Fwd: igraph debian/* files
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Mathieu Malaterre
<mathieu.malaterre@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 04:31:15PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>>> Just FYI
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Tamas Nepusz <tamas@cs.rhul.ac.uk>
>>> Date: Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:16 PM
>>> Subject: Re: igraph
>>> To: Mathieu Malaterre <mathieu.malaterre@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Sure, if that would make things easier for you. I'll adjust the
>>> makefiles upstream so the generated package won't include the debian/
>>> subdir anymore. This will be in effect from the next release which may
>>> be 0.5.3 or 0.6 (0.6 is more likely, I don't think we'll have another
>>> minor release in the 0.5 branch).
>>
>> Ahh, that's great.
>>
>> You might have noticed that I added automake Build-Depends because
>> otherwise pbuilder fails to build.
>>
>> Just tell me if you consider the package as ready for upload (but
>> I can not sponsor it before tomorrow. If anybody else might be
>> faster I don't mind.
>
> Actually Charles raised a good point: how about the R interface. I
> think I missed the installation of those files (I do not use R at
> all).
>
> Do not upload yet, please.
Ok the C interface is good to go. The R interface actually ships a
convenient copy of igraph and build with defaults that are not
compatible. See the TODO file in
svn+ssh://malat-guest@svn.debian.org/svn/debian-med/trunk/packages/R/r-cran-igraph/trunk/debian
It may take some time before I get the R interface working, I'll check
with upstream what is the way to go.
Thanks for sponsor,
--
Mathieu
PS: hwo about dicomscope ? Is there anything still missing ?
Reply to: