Re: GDCM 2.0.6 is out !
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
understood. I'll be happy with any other system, for now it was just
very convenient for me.
Sure. That's why I tried to explain patiently why a think which might
be convenient for the first time mighht cause problems. It is no shame
in it if you as a Debian newcomer handle things this way. My suggestion
would be to release another point release without this dir and all things
are fine.
Done: malat-guest
... is now a member of Debian-Med team and have commit permissions.
Never heard of this tool, will look into it ASAP.
It is very useful because it builds in a clean chroot system. You
have no chance to forget build dependencies which are often installed
opn developer machines and thus the build works on the local developer
machine. Pbuilder has a clean chroot with very basic packages, installs
all Build dependencies automatically and then tries to compile. If a
build fails because a build-depends is missing you will immediately
notice. Moreover you can build against different distributions when
maintaining a stable / testting / unstable / whatever pbuilder chroot.
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debian-med/trunk/packages/gdmc/trunk/debian/?rev=0&sc=0
Ok, then if you grant me write access, my first task will be to fix
the spelling :)
gdmc -> gdcm
Uhmm, sorry. I'm so addicted to mc that I alsways tend to spell the
combination of 'c' and 'm' as "mc" - please forgive me even future misspellings
of this. ;-) And, for sure, I fixed the problem caused ba me myself ...
those are only warnings the error must have been earlier (make -j4 was
hardcoded in the rules file so it takes a couple more iteration for
make to actually stop on the error).
Ahh, OK, I trust you will be able to fix this problem because you know the
code at best ...
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: