Re: Amide [Was: Report from Libre Software Meeting]
- To: Debian Med Project List <debian-med@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Amide [Was: Report from Libre Software Meeting]
- From: Dominique Belhachemi <domibel@cs.tu-berlin.de>
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:50:37 +0100
- Message-id: <1198014637.3497.28.camel@localhost>
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712180701540.13759@wr-linux02>
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707171017090.1147@wr-linux02> <20070717183614.GA10014@runkel> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707172304500.30767@wr-linux02> <20070718095810.GB3244@gloin> <20070718185653.GG22839@washoe.onerussian.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712170918570.29108@wr-linux02> <1197929506.3325.5.camel@localhost> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712180701540.13759@wr-linux02>
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 07:03 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:
>
> > Yes i noticed that. A new version of Amide is uploaded to unstable.
>
> Thanks. What do you think how to proceede with libfame and ecat? We
> had some discussion / ideas here on this list in July / August if I
> remember right.
1. libfame
I think to package libfame only for amide is waste of time.
If you have a lock at the todo list in the Amide main folder you can
find
* switch from libfame to ffmpeg for mpeg encoding
We only have to wait... ;-)
2. ECAT
It is already possible to import ECAT files. Amide uses xmedcon for this
task. This makes libecat obsolete.
I think Amide is in a good shape for the moment.
Kind regards
Dominique
Reply to: