Re: Should Wise2 be installed by default by biopython ?

To: debian-med@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Should Wise2 be installed by default by biopython ?
From: Philipp Benner <pbenner@uos.de>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 13:26:51 +0100
Message-id: <20071125122650.GD15988@philipp-benner.de>
Mail-followup-to: debian-med@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <20071124042015.GH30840@kunpuu.plessy.org>
References: <E1IvBHK-0005UT-2r@alioth.debian.org> <20071123020012.GC1257@kunpuu.plessy.org> <20071124000347.GC15988@philipp-benner.de> <20071124042015.GH30840@kunpuu.plessy.org>

> What is biopython using Wise2 for ?

Biopython comes with a module Bio.Wise which is just a wrapper for dnal
and psw from wise. It seems that there is consensus about how to handle
wrappers. So I'll move wise from recommends to suggests.

Cheers,

-- 
Philipp Benner

Reply to:

References:
- Shoule Wise2 be installed by default by biopython ?
  - From: Charles Plessy <charles-debian-nospam@plessy.org>
- Re: Shoule Wise2 be installed by default by biopython ?
  - From: Philipp Benner <pbenner@uos.de>
- Re: Should Wise2 be installed by default by biopython ?
  - From: Charles Plessy <charles-debian-nospam@plessy.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Please, stop abusing ddtss/DDTP
Next by Date: Re: Our goals for Lenny
Previous by thread: Re: Should Wise2 be installed by default by biopython ?
Next by thread: Re: Shoule Wise2 be installed by default by biopython ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread