Report from Libre Software Meeting
Hi,
last week I attended the Libre Software Meeting in Amiens. The most
interesting topics for myself were the the scientific and the medical
track. I had three talks which are available at the usual place at
http://people.debian.org/~tille/talks/
Regarding Debian-Med imaging I learned two lessons:
1. cimg-dev is definitely something we want in med-imaging-dev.
Perhaps we also want gimp in the suggests of med-imaging or
rather I will ask the maintainer of gimp-plugin-registry to
build a separate package of the command line tool greycstoration
that uses the cimg library.
LSM-talk at: http://www.rmll.info/article222.html
(Hint: There should ba an English description but the web page
is broken)
Just see
http://cimg.sourceforge.net/
2. There are thre interesting free programs for radiology imaging:
Osirix (unfortunately runs only on Mac, any porters???), xmedcon
(which we have) and amide (http://amide.sourceforge.net/) which
we perhaps should have.
LSM-talk at: http://www.rmll.info/article437.html
On my train journey back I started packaging amide and my trial
is at:
http://people.debian.org/~tille/packages/amide/
Weak points of packaging:
- I have no idea of scrollkeeper and I doubt that stuff I did
here will work - at least the help in the executable does
not come up.
- There is a really strange packaging issue that one patch is
not applied by dpatch. If you are interested move
http://people.debian.org/~tille/packages/amide/debian/patches_not_working/src_Makefile.in.diff
to patches (and make sure you are using the original
src/Makefile.in from the tarball because I just changed
it manually to get rid of the -rpath linking). So this
is kind of a puzzle homework for people interested in
packaging.
- There seem to be two needed (suggested?) libraries missing
in Debian z_matrix_70/libecat and volpack/libvolpack (see
README). Some investigation should be done regards
a) How useful amide works without these libs.
b) In how far we could need these libs in Debian-Med
in general.
- The package needs (suggests) libfame which is currently
available at debian-multimedia.org but not on official
Debian mirror. Some investigations have to be done in
how far this is an issue or whether libfame could be made
official.
I have not yet decided whether I would like to be the official
amide maintainer. We currently have xmedcon and thus I regard
finishing gnumed-server packages more important and will do this
first, but perhaps somebody wants to step in because most of the
work of packaging seems to be done - perhaps some questions
on debian-devel or debian-mentors will solve the
Regarding Debian-Med practice I also learned two lessons:
1. Besides the Elexis system there is another "Swiss-made"
Eclipse based practice management framework. The hint was
given in the talk
http://www.rmll.info/article226.html
... but I realised that I made sloppy notes and my log
is missing the name of this beast. The difference between
Elexis and the alternative system seemed to be more or less
implementing the differences between German speaking and
French speaking part of Swiss. If you want to learn more
just ask Google or the author of the talk Werner Keil
(Creative Arts & Technologies - UK).
2. Not at any talk but not less interesting is the fact that
below our radar seemed to evolve an interesting practice
management system that at minimum should be listed on our
TODO list. If you are able to read French language have
a look at
http://upsis.club.fr/MedinTux/index.html
I have seen a short demo of Gérard DELAFOND and was impressed
by the features this program shows and according to Gérard it
is fully capable to manage a medical practice - at least if
it is situated in France. Here we come to the restriction that
does not enable me anything to do regarding packaging: The
documentation and code is completely written in French and
we would need a French developer who might build Debian packages
if we would like to include it into Debian which I would
regard as an interesting target. So if somebody wants
to step in here he would be welcome.
In any case I see a bidirectional way for cooperation: Authors
of other practice management systems might be able to learn
from this project and the authors of MedinTux might be
interested in steps that might lead to more internationalisation.
(I hope some GNUmed people might give some input about their
view of abstraction from medical record and country specific
health system.)
I would regard the Debian-Med list as a possible forum for
a technical discussion about this.
So far for the LSM report.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: