Re: BALLView: new package version
[debian-tex-maint@lists.debian.org in CC for just announcing the missing
of fancyheadings.sty]
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Michael Banck wrote:
* tetex-* got retired in Debian, texlive and texlive-latex-extra should
get added as Build-Depends. However, that still didn't do it for me,
it failed on fancyheadings.sty, and this doesn't appear to be in any
package right now. Maybe we will have to do without fancy headings
for now.
You are right fancyheadings.sty shows up only in tetex-extra and apt-file
does not find a hit in texlive. Would you be so kind to write a bug report
against texlive because if I understand it right it claims to be a superset
of tetex which has exceptions obviousely. I do not regard fancyheadings.sty
as a great showstopper but it just happens to be used probably in other
source packages.
* The way you not just rename upstream's debian/ to debian-upstream/,
but extensively use it in debian/rules looks very dubious to me; e.g.
debian-upstream/createBALLVIEWDEB looks very un-debianish to me. I
really suggest you just ignore debian-upstream; I very much doubt it
would pass the ftp-master checks for entering the Debian archive
as well.
I normally advise upstream to not ship a debian directory in their
upstream tarball.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: