[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Package status in Debian-med website



On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Michael Hanke wrote:

Thanks for pointing me to the translations, I completely ignored this.
You're definitely right!

Ah well, you young fools, you. ;-))) You always want to be quick, ;-)
Honestly, translations are in special fields like medicine
extremely important.  If you observe multi lannguage Wikis the
contents drifts away really strong.  Even in the only Wiki I
really like and where I actively take part (WikiPedia) the contents of
different languages has not even the goal to be a translation
because it is just impossible.  So we have to be carefully and
keep the more or less static and automatically generated contents
in WML and enable good translations.  BTW, if the DDTP project
continues to work again, we just get the translations for free.

I created a wiki version of the med-imaging page, so we have something
concrete to discuss about.

http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMedImaging

Looks nice and apropriate but as I said I would prefer the
autogeneration way for the included packages.  On the other
hand I admit it doesn't really matter what I think: We have
a DoOcracy and the doer decides what becomes done.  If you
just overrun me with nice Wiki pages I'm neither willing nor
able to stop you. ;-)

I have included the list of official packages for the moment (did that
before I read about the translations). I also borrowed Charles' idea of
including popularity stats and technical reports.

Great - I've seen this.

Perhaps an additional link to a list of tagged bugs makes sense.

Definitely.

Kind regards

         Andreas.

--
http://fam-tille.de



Reply to: