Re: updating debian-security-support(.limited) in buster and bullseye (Re: EOL candidates for security-support-ended.deb10 (recap))

[Anton Gladky <gladk@debian.org>]

Hi Holger,

just to clarify the things. If the "-limited" file will be versioned,

I think it is better not to include python2.7 or cython
into the buster-file, as we still support them for buster. But,

some internal scripts should be modified in this case to

use the suffix.

If it remains versioned, well, I do not know then. Maybe it is

better to include them into the "debisan-security-support-limited".

Regards

Anton

Am Mo., 15. Aug. 2022 um 21:11 Uhr schrieb Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>:

On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 07:51:56PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
> Regarding your question, if there are not other objections, I would say
> please go ahead with an upload (despite python2.7).

Anton, what do you mean with that python2.7 comment?

pochu also said on irc:

<pochu> h01ger: I think it makes sense to merge them, except for the [pc]ython
        ones, as python2.7 is fully supported in buster


--
cheers,
        Holger

 ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
 ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
 ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
 ⠈⠳⣄

In Germany we don‘t say „Happy Valentine‘s Day, I love you“, we say „ich werde
diesen vom Markt kreierten, konsumorientierten Trend des Kapitalismus nicht
unterstützen,“ and I think that’s beautiful. (Hazel Brugger)