[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Thoughts on Xen updates in LTS

Hi Roberto,

besides what Moritz said...

On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 01:37:14PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > have you done this in coordination with credative who were working on that before?
> I did not coordinate with Credativ.  In the past, the xen package always
> showed as "claimed" by Credativ in dla-needed.txt.  I interpreted the
> presence of xen in dla-needed.txt unclaimed, along with the absence of
> updates over the last 5-6 months, as indication that the work was not
> being done by anyone else.

right, i'm not sure why Credativ was removed from this entry, cc:ing 
Waldi for clarification.

> If I should have coordinated, I apologize.  

I just checked the lts git repo and the security tracker one, and there was 
no trace indicating that credativ was working on this, so I don't think 
an apology is needed/warranted here..

> With whom should I
> communicate to ensure that I don't do duplicate work?  Or would it be
> better if I simply stopped working on the package?
I think Moritz has a point when he said what he said...


       PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: