Hi Roberto,
besides what Moritz said...
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 01:37:14PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > have you done this in coordination with credative who were working on that before?
> I did not coordinate with Credativ. In the past, the xen package always
> showed as "claimed" by Credativ in dla-needed.txt. I interpreted the
> presence of xen in dla-needed.txt unclaimed, along with the absence of
> updates over the last 5-6 months, as indication that the work was not
> being done by anyone else.
right, i'm not sure why Credativ was removed from this entry, cc:ing
Waldi for clarification.
> If I should have coordinated, I apologize.
I just checked the lts git repo and the security tracker one, and there was
no trace indicating that credativ was working on this, so I don't think
an apology is needed/warranted here..
> With whom should I
> communicate to ensure that I don't do duplicate work? Or would it be
> better if I simply stopped working on the package?
I think Moritz has a point when he said what he said...
--
cheers,
Holger
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature