[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Drop support for libqb?

On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 08:34:57AM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > for jessie, there's no need to go via SRM, *we* are maintaining jessie
> > now.
> I understand that.  My wording above was awkward, but it was intended to
> make a distinction that I could just go ahead with the jessie upload at
> any point.


> > for stretch (and buster) I'm pondering whether we should do another
> > upload to unstable first, as I did a commit yesterday marking chromium
> > as unsupported in stretch. so I've come to conclude that I'll upload
> > this right away (it will just delay buster migration by a day) as this
> > change is pretty good to have for stretch.
> Oh, OK.  Please go ahead.

ok, will do.

> > so debsnap is buggy?
> I think it just reflects that the packages which were uploaded differ
> from the corresponding tags in the repository. 

ah :/

> Since it sounds like you have another updated past mine, would you be
> willing to take over from here? 


> I have attached my draft DLA text so that you can add the chromium bit
> to it.  Also, feel free to edit my draft text for clarity, consistency,
> etc.

thank you for your work so far & will do!


       PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: