On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 08:34:57AM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > for jessie, there's no need to go via SRM, *we* are maintaining jessie
> > now.
> I understand that. My wording above was awkward, but it was intended to
> make a distinction that I could just go ahead with the jessie upload at
> any point.
ah!
> > for stretch (and buster) I'm pondering whether we should do another
> > upload to unstable first, as I did a commit yesterday marking chromium
> > as unsupported in stretch. so I've come to conclude that I'll upload
> > this right away (it will just delay buster migration by a day) as this
> > change is pretty good to have for stretch.
> Oh, OK. Please go ahead.
ok, will do.
> > so debsnap is buggy?
> I think it just reflects that the packages which were uploaded differ
> from the corresponding tags in the repository.
ah :/
> Since it sounds like you have another updated past mine, would you be
> willing to take over from here?
yes.
> I have attached my draft DLA text so that you can add the chromium bit
> to it. Also, feel free to edit my draft text for clarity, consistency,
> etc.
thank you for your work so far & will do!
--
cheers,
Holger
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature