Re: Drop support for libqb?
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 05:19:03PM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote:
>
> And then it would be ideal to upload the package to unstable and then
> file a SRM bug to update the package in stretch, in addition to
> uploading to jessie. (Probably this should also result in a DLA, not
> 100% sure though. Thoughts & comments definitly welcome.)
>
Hi Holger,
I am hesitant to file the bugs with the SRMs and to do the jessie
upload. I merged the 2019.11.15 tag into the jessie and stretch
branches. I also created a new buster branch from that tag.
The buster update goes from 2019.06.13..2019.11.15_deb10u1, the stretch
update from debian/2019.02.01_deb9u1..2019.11.15_deb9u1 and the jessie
update from debian/2019.02.01_deb8u1..2019.11.15_deb8u1. The git diffs
look sane. However, after building each of the packages and checking
the debdiffs (against source packages downloaded with debsnap), the
stretch and jessie packages I built seem to be inducing many more
changes than those revealed by git diff.
Before I go ahead with pushing changes to salsa, uploading to jessie,
releasing a DLA, and filing bugs requesting approval to upload to buster
and stretch, I'd like to make sure that I have gone about all of this in
the right way.
What is the best way to facilitate this? Should I fork
debian-security-support and push my proposed changes there for you to
review? Should I post source packages and debdiffs for review? Let me
know how I should proceed.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
Reply to: