Re: LTS, no-dsa reasoning
Hi Salvatore,
On 08/04/2019 22:18, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> On 08/04/2019 21:56, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 09:51:19PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>>> Recently I noticed that for a no-dsa (either for no-dsa or the
>>> stronger ignored) as explanation was started to be used e.g. "not used
>>> by any sponsor".
> Firstly, as an aside, it seemed to me that <ignored> was not stronger,
> but more precise than <no-dsa> (a "sub-state" as documented at
> https://security-team.debian.org/security_tracker.html#issues-not-warranting-a-security-advisory
> ).
> Let me know if you prefer we use <no-dsa>
Ping? :)
- Sylvain
Reply to: