[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: LTS, no-dsa reasoning and sponsored packages

Hi Ingo,

> labeling it "minor issues" when the real reason is "sponsors needed"
> sounds wrong to me.
> I'd say "minor issues" is right for minor issues. And "sponsors needed"
> is a legitimate, helpful additional information.
> It seems to me, that it's not uncommon to Debian to search for a sponsor
> of a package:
> https://mentors.debian.net/sponsors

When we speak about sponsors in this context, we mean the "contributing
companies and organizations", the entities funding the Debian LTS
project[0], not mentors from the package sponsoring process.

Yet another reason to not use "sponsoring" related arguments in the

[0] https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Funding

                Hugo Lefeuvre (hle)    |    www.owl.eu.com
RSA4096_ 360B 03B3 BF27 4F4D 7A3F D5E8 14AA 1EB8 A247 3DFD
ed25519_ 37B2 6D38 0B25 B8A2 6B9F 3A65 A36F 5357 5F2D DC4C

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: