Re: ghostscript testing
On 27/03/2019 00:00, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 26.03.19 um 15:55 schrieb Sylvain Beucler:
>> Markus, I read in the archives that you backported fixes in earlier
>> security uploads - any other tip? :)
> I did all the testing myself by setting up a Jessie environment and then
> I tested with the POCs and the command line tools to spot any
> regressions. I could reproduce all issues, so at one point I was
> confident the problem at hand was solved. Without an extensive test
> suite or a reproducer this is quite challenging. Since we made the
> decision to follow new upstream releases, we just have to make sure that
> reverse-dependencies keep working. So I would do some smoke testing and
> verify that the reported problem is fixed.
Thanks for confirming I didn't miss anything.
Waiting for 9.27 then.