Re: proposed removal of Enigmail from jessie/LTS
On 2018-12-19 17:03:26, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:40:07AM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> I've now also re-read this thread (for the 2nd time today..) and first
> I'd like to notice that all the concerns were only brought up in the
> last week, so it was definitly right from you to work on this for those
> months. Second, it now reads to me as if Emilio changed his mind after
> expressing concerns on Dec 14th, he indeed replied much more favorably
> on the 18th.
Thanks for your message, I'm relieved and happy to get support from
> I mostly worried that you didnt test all dependent packages and that we
> essentially might break those when trying to support a package no
> customer has expressed need for. But then I also suppose such breakage
> could be fixed...
So I was mostly concerned about libgcrypt dependencies, and in
particular cryptsetup, and smoke tests seems to go through okay
there, for what that's worth...
> and now we are back to square one :/
Not really. We're actually at square N-1, we just need to do that one
final jump to get in the "let's actually support that newer version"
Should we pursue this? Are there any other packages that should be
Would love other people's opinion as well...
Pour marcher au pas d'une musique militaire, il n'y a pas besoin de
cerveau, une moelle épinière suffit.
- Albert Einstein