Re: the way to enigmail: gnupg 2.1 backport considerations
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So I've been looking at Enigmail again, after a long journey helping
> people in stable getting that stuff fixed. It's pretty obvious there's
> no way to upload that without first doing a GnuPG 2.1 backport into
> jessie.
>
> That, it turns out, requires *four* more source package
> backports. Fortunately for us, *all* of those are already in
> jessie-backports. They would, unfortunately, probably need to be
> uploaded straight into jessie-security, however, if only for
> consistency's sake.
Not only for consistency, jessie-backports is closed and will (hopefully) get
archived soon.
Alex
Reply to: