Re: Wheezy update of tre?

To: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
Cc: tre@packages.debian.org, debian-lts@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Wheezy update of tre?
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:59:53 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20161020135953.wsdhsylztgl4gu3o@cantor.unex.es>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1476971652.2154329.762017489.1B90F21A@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References: <[🔎] 1476971652.2154329.762017489.1B90F21A@webmail.messagingengine.com>

Hi.

Looking at this right now.

But I'm a little bit surprised that the whole story begins in wheezy LTS.

Should this not start in unstable with a bug report?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- fixing in oldstable before unstable (was Re: Wheezy update of tre?)
  - From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
- Re: Wheezy update of tre?
  - From: Ola Lundqvist <ola@inguza.com>
- Re: Wheezy update of tre?
  - From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
- Re: Wheezy update of tre?
  - From: Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@orangeseeds.org>

References:
- Wheezy update of tre?
  - From: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Wheezy update of tre?
Next by Date: fixing in oldstable before unstable (was Re: Wheezy update of tre?)
Previous by thread: Wheezy update of tre?
Next by thread: fixing in oldstable before unstable (was Re: Wheezy update of tre?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread