[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

fixing in oldstable before unstable (was Re: Wheezy update of tre?)

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:59:53PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> But I'm a little bit surprised that the whole story begins in wheezy LTS.
> Should this not start in unstable with a bug report?

this often happens when there was a CVE with or without a bug filed and
noone uploaded a fix. then, at some point, the LTS team comes around and
is paid to fix this in LTS…

I also think it would be better to always (well, unless the package is
gone) make sure this is fixed in unstable first and then in LTS but I 
dont think this is an individual question but rather think this should
be addressed by implementing it as mandatory part of the LTS workflow.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: