Re: Wheezy update of dietlibc?
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 11:27:13AM +0200, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > Needs to be built with -sa ;)
> Whoops! I blame the change of pattern re. sponsoring. Just re-uploaded. :)
> > (but wait first that the dietlibc version has been built) and avialable.
> ACK. Will check in 24h, then do sourceful uploads of minit and mksh.
> >From an annoucement point of view, I will assume I will then issue a single
> DLA, mentioning the n packages that were rebuilt.
Yes that was in the rare cases were we needed to do that our approach.
Since the fix is associated to the dietlibc source, just add to
data/DLA/list the entry for dietlibc, but then mention in the DLA text
which packages needed to be rebuild.