Re: Wheezy update of roundcube?

[Guilhem Moulin <guilhem@guilhem.org>]

On Tue, 03 May 2016 at 10:47:31 -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> I agree, however I suspect most people using roundcube in production are
> probably using the backport... There's even a dangling backport in
> wheezy right now (0.9)... a little messy.

Sorry, I meant oldstable-backports not oldstable.  Packaging 1.0.x for
wheezy-backports sounds much easier than backporting security patches to
wheezy's 0.7.x.
 
> I filed a bug about the dangling backport in wheezy:
> 
>  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813843
> 
> I wonder how best to deal with this: should the backport just be removed
> or what?

Agreed, I think 0.9 should be either removed from the archive or
superseeded by 1.0.x.

Cheers,
-- 
Guilhem.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature