El 27/11/15 a las 14:43, Raphael Hertzog escribió: > On Thu, 26 Nov 2015, Holger Levsen wrote: > > why not? DLA means "Debian LTS Announcement" and I think it's worthwhile to > > document all changes somewhere, exactly because it's oldoldstable, so normally > > doesn't change. So announcing this via a DLA seems entirely approbriate to me. > > Just to be clear, I want to announce this via debian-lts-announce but not > associate it to any DLA number because DLA means "a security issue has been > fixed" which is not the case here. > I thought that too, but the examples of DSA given by Holger in IRC: DSA 2938-1, DSA 2907-1, DSA 2819-1 and DSA 2548-1 show that A DLA could be also needed and appropriate. > (BTW I'm not sure if it means "Debian LTS Advisory" or "Debian LTS > Announce") > > And there are bots handling DLA to auto-publish news about possible > security issues... for example on lwn.net. And I don't think this is > appropriate. > It seems that lwn.net can handle this: https://lwn.net/Articles/595312/ > > Or, alternativly, why not include the news about these packages being also > > updated in the DLA for the mysql-5.5 update? > > We could do that, I just fear that there will a delay between the uploads > of the fixed packages and the final upload of mysql-5.5 and we will get > questions before then... I share this feeling. Cheers, Santiago
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature