Re: Status of libhtp and suricata in squeeze
On 17 March 2015 at 11:07, Raphael Hertzog <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2015, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
>> This is security software, which needs to stay updated to be useful.
>> That's the kind of 'usability' we are speaking about.
>> I believe upstream is no longer supporting 1.x series, which is the
>> version included in both squeeze and wheezy.
> And is moving to a new upstream version something that you would like to
> Are there non-backwards compatible change that will cause problems to
> users if we pursue that path?
I don't know actually.
But I would say: that doesn't matter at this point. An outdated
suricata is like an outdated antivirus, users need to move forward.
Is not only the lack of upstream support. Users would like to get rid
of some important security issues and bugs.
Do you think there is chance for suricata 2.x in squeeze-lts? What are
Arturo Borrero González