Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote...
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 04:08:01PM +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> > Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote...
> >
> > > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 09:49:45AM +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> > > > So I
> > > > am thinking of an an updated version of libdbi-perl for squeeze-lts
> > > > that lowers the dependency on libplrpc-perl to Recommends: or
> > > > Suggests:, or drops it entirely. The libplrpc-perl package has no
> > > > other reverse dependencies so this hopefully does not create even more
> > > > damage.
> > > >
> > > > And I guess the same problem exists in wheezy.
> > >
> > > Exactly. Such an update will be issued for wheezy (Salvatore is working
> > > on that) and the same should be issued for squeeze-lts.
> >
> > "should be" as in "someone's already working on it"; or rather "could
> > please somebody do the job"? If it's the latter, sorrydave.wav - and
> > perhaps front desk needs a gentle ping.
>
> I've added this as an item to the lts-needed.txt file, anyone can pick
> that work item as outlined on my other mail.
Salvatore,
full quote since I don't know whether you're subscribed to debian-lts.
However, I'm interested in an coordinated fix for libplrpc-perl in
both wheezy and squeeze-lts. Therefore, can you either address both
distributions, or get in touch with me so I can, er, adapt your change
for squeeze-lts? To be honest, it seems wiser you do both, especially
since I cannot do uploads yet.
Christoph
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature