Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote... > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 04:08:01PM +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote: > > Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote... > > > > > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 09:49:45AM +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote: > > > > So I > > > > am thinking of an an updated version of libdbi-perl for squeeze-lts > > > > that lowers the dependency on libplrpc-perl to Recommends: or > > > > Suggests:, or drops it entirely. The libplrpc-perl package has no > > > > other reverse dependencies so this hopefully does not create even more > > > > damage. > > > > > > > > And I guess the same problem exists in wheezy. > > > > > > Exactly. Such an update will be issued for wheezy (Salvatore is working > > > on that) and the same should be issued for squeeze-lts. > > > > "should be" as in "someone's already working on it"; or rather "could > > please somebody do the job"? If it's the latter, sorrydave.wav - and > > perhaps front desk needs a gentle ping. > > I've added this as an item to the lts-needed.txt file, anyone can pick > that work item as outlined on my other mail. Salvatore, full quote since I don't know whether you're subscribed to debian-lts. However, I'm interested in an coordinated fix for libplrpc-perl in both wheezy and squeeze-lts. Therefore, can you either address both distributions, or get in touch with me so I can, er, adapt your change for squeeze-lts? To be honest, it seems wiser you do both, especially since I cannot do uploads yet. Christoph
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature