Re: Source style regarding here-documents
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> we aim for live-* to work with the posix subset only, in order to
> minimize the system requirements as it should be for 'bootstrap tools'
> like live-*.
I don't want to initiate a flame war on what shell to use best for task
XY and minimizing system requirements is good and all...
That said, I'd like to point out that to me, 'posix subset' for
'bootstrap tools' doesn't make much sense here. I can see your point
where you would want to use only POSIX stuff for scripts running within
the initrd context, so let's say live-boot is out of luck of getting
"prettified".
The bootstrapping environment on the other hand would be a full-blown
Debian installation. And even if only a "base system + live-*" was
installed...dash would be available. It just makes absolutely no sense
to self-impose such artificial limitations. What's the problem with
using dash's features when it's available anyways? Or even with defining
bash as dependency for live-*? I mean we're talking KB here and not some
dozen perl or python packages...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=FM8P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: