tag 683400 + moreinfo thanks On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 09:14:54PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > On 08/02/2012 08:32 PM, Philipp Kern wrote: > > Thanks for not giving any further information. > > let me re-iterate: ftp-master told me to do ask the release-team to give > permission to ftp-master to process the package in NEW for unstable. > that's excately what i did. > > wouldn't it make sense that ftp-masters and release-team do talk to each > other if the one or other team needs more information for this, instead > of having me in between? there's nothing that i can do about it on > either side/team anyway. They were in Cc, but you seem to be unable to summarize past discussions, too. You also seem to be unable to describe your changes to the existing packages that you want to do except for handwaiving. I don't see how we could handle this request, so I'm tagging it moreinfo now, even if it might as well be closed unless there's more useful input. > > If this is not intended for wheezy and if other > > -live components will not use or rely on it, that's ok. > it is intended for wheezy, but other live-* packages can make use of it, > but do not rely on it. lxc on the other hand relies on it. How would lxc depend on something live-*'ish? And why should we accept a change to lxc that depends on something live-*'ish? So from the point of wheezy I'm inclined to say: doesn't affect it. > > We're also wary in which state -live is in given [1] and > > your reply[2]. > live-installer requires working d-i, d-i currently is still too fragile. > but as said, we'll get there in time. Please elaborate. What timeframe are you assuming? As for uncooperativeness it doesn't help that you ignore half of the mails. Maybe you need everything spelt out instead of blindly assuming that you'd somehow get what questions we're aiming at. Of course I should not assume malice, I guess. Kind regards Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature