Re: Planning for next squeeze point release (6.0.4)
On 12/15/2011 11:19 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> (and to which you appear to have ignored the response, at least
> publicly)
that response was a non-sequitur.
> That mail says you'd like to know "the rough estimated date" for
> planning purposes, [...]
exactely..
> The purpose of the initial co-ordination mails is precisely to narrow
> that "rough estimated date" to an exact date
..which is why we want to be cc'ed, it's as simple as that.
> (Actually, in both of those cases fixes generally get worked on and
> uploaded throughout the cycle rather than just towards the end, which is
> arguably a better workflow for all involved.)
you should know by now that -live works a bit different wrt/ releases
due to the fact, that it has to adapt to all changes *after* everyone
(-kernel, -boot, -release, -ftp) has done them.
> Then I suspect you haven't read the above. Hopefully it does some good
> for someone, in any case.
it is always a good thing to allege the other one is not reading stuff
if the initial problem solely lies in the own ignorance of the issue; or
not.
--
Address: Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: daniel.baumann@progress-technologies.net
Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/
Reply to: