Re: RFC: live-initramfs 2.x features

[intrigeri <intrigeri@boum.org>]

Hi,

Daniel Baumann wrote (25 Jan 2010 19:19:12 GMT) :

> Philippe Lelédy wrote:
>> 2) persistent=home to bypass global persistence.

> persistency needs to be redone, this is one of the reasons to do
> exactely. had that already in mind :)

Are there any plans for the persistency redo?

We have plans [1] to implement some bits of persistency in
T(A)ILS [2], and wonder if it is worth basing new work on
live-initramfs 1.x persistency features (e.g. home-sn).

[1] http://amnesia.boum.org/todo/persistence/
[2] http://amnesia.boum.org/

Bye,
-- 
  intrigeri <intrigeri@boum.org>
  | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
  | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr-fingerprint.asc
  | The impossible just takes a bit longer.