[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#620829: [new checks] implements parts of the java policy



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 2011-04-06 08:47, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2011-04-06 01:43, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>> [...[
>>   In any case, attached is a tarball of the output of git format-patch
>> (without any particular options). I've checked they apply cleanly to the
>> recent rc2 release.
> 
> 
> Cool, will have a look (hopefully Friday).  From my initial review I
> might split and merge some patches.  The merge of my branch will wait
> until Tuesday, so I will do the changes required for the merge.  If you
> could provide some test cases for these tags before then, that would be
> great.
> 

Alright, I had a look and have merged the patches into 4 with some minor
code-style changes.  Before I commit the patches, I would like some test
cases to go with them.

> Btw, for the "no class" jar files, have you checked some of the
> "interesting" jars like:
> 
> /usr/lib/iceweasel/extensions/langpack-ca@firefox.mozilla.org/chrome/ca.jar
> /usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions/wiki-publisher/help/ca/help.jar
> 
> in iceweasel-l10n-ca and libreoffice-wiki-publisher (respectively)?
> They could be useful as long as they (e.g.) a properties file or even
> just translated html files etc.
> 
>>  [...]

I see you have tested some of your tags[1]; I am curious about your
findings, you say that 30% of the javalibs you have tests triggers the
tags.  Have you any ideas if any of those are false-positives?

~Niels

[1] http://wiki.debian.org/Java/QATools

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=Kh+F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: java-patches.tar.gz
Description: application/gzip

Attachment: java-patches.tar.gz.sig
Description: Binary data


Reply to: