[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#620829: [new checks] implements parts of the java policy



On 05/04/11 21:39, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>> Finally, we are planning to release 2.5.0~rc2 soon and I am hoping to
>> merge a branch shortly after the release.  *If* this branch is merged
>> your collection will need to depend on two new collections (index and
>> fields), since these will provide the "index" file and the "fields/"
>> directory (respectively) in that branch.
>>   If you check for the index file instead of fields/package, then you
>> can avoid the fields dep as far as I can see.
>>   The check will also need a Needs-Info on fields ($info->relation).
> 
>   Well, thanks a lot. I'll work on all that later on tonight, hoping to
> send a format-patch early enough for the rc2 release.

  Looks like I completely misunderstood you for that.

  In any case, attached is a tarball of the output of git format-patch
(without any particular options). I've checked they apply cleanly to the
recent rc2 release.

  I've added quite a few checks and relaxed some. Even if this is far
from thorough (all the javadoc stuff are missing, for one), this is
getting a little more complete.

  I'm on my way to update http://wiki.debian.org/Java/QATools according
to the contents of the patch.

  Cheers,

	Vincent

-- 
His followers called him Mahasamatman and said he was a god. He
preferred to drop the Maha- and the -atman, however, and called
himself Sam.
 -- Roger Zelazny, Lord of Light

Vincent, listening to Repentance (Dream Theater)

Attachment: java-lintian-checks.tar.gz
Description: application/gzip


Reply to: