Bug#620829: [new checks] implements parts of the java policy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-04-06 01:43, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> On 05/04/11 21:39, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>>> Finally, we are planning to release 2.5.0~rc2 soon and I am hoping to
>>> merge a branch shortly after the release. *If* this branch is merged
>>> your collection will need to depend on two new collections (index and
>>> fields), since these will provide the "index" file and the "fields/"
>>> directory (respectively) in that branch.
>>> If you check for the index file instead of fields/package, then you
>>> can avoid the fields dep as far as I can see.
>>> The check will also need a Needs-Info on fields ($info->relation).
>>
>> Well, thanks a lot. I'll work on all that later on tonight, hoping to
>> send a format-patch early enough for the rc2 release.
>
> Looks like I completely misunderstood you for that.
>
Sorry, my bad - I was too busy finishing the release to read the "later
tonight part". :/ I should have been more clear that the master branch
was closed for the ~rc2 release. Though I am expecting ~rc3 to have a
short release cycle as well (e.g. expecting a multi-arch patch soon).
> In any case, attached is a tarball of the output of git format-patch
> (without any particular options). I've checked they apply cleanly to the
> recent rc2 release.
>
Cool, will have a look (hopefully Friday). From my initial review I
might split and merge some patches. The merge of my branch will wait
until Tuesday, so I will do the changes required for the merge. If you
could provide some test cases for these tags before then, that would be
great.
Btw, for the "no class" jar files, have you checked some of the
"interesting" jars like:
/usr/lib/iceweasel/extensions/langpack-ca@firefox.mozilla.org/chrome/ca.jar
/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions/wiki-publisher/help/ca/help.jar
in iceweasel-l10n-ca and libreoffice-wiki-publisher (respectively)?
They could be useful as long as they (e.g.) a properties file or even
just translated html files etc.
> I've added quite a few checks and relaxed some. Even if this is far
> from thorough (all the javadoc stuff are missing, for one), this is
> getting a little more complete.
>
If you need inspiration here, feel free to dig into jh_scanjavadoc from
javahelper.
> I'm on my way to update http://wiki.debian.org/Java/QATools according
> to the contents of the patch.
>
Great! :)
> Cheers,
>
> Vincent
>
~Niels
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=e7ml
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: