Russ Allbery wrote: > Raphael Geissert writes: > >> None of these require my previous changes to be applied, but would be >> great if the others could be applied as well. > > I applied the first patch. For the move of common_data, I agree that this > is an improvement over the current state, but except for %known_arches, > that data actually belongs in Lintian::Data. I though about doing that too, but I hesitated. Attached mbox does it all. > Could you move it there > instead? Otherwise, we'll just have to do it later and there's no point > in touching the same code twice. > > I realize this will make Lintian a bit slower until we optimize > Lintian::Data further, but it's more than worth it for the maintenance > improvements of simple text files with lists instead of Perl code. > Sure Cheers, -- Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer www.debian.org - get.debian.net
Attachment:
lintian-reorg.mbox
Description: application/mbox