[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [RFC] Replacing Lintian::Relation::Version



Russ Allbery wrote:
"Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> writes:
I've plumped for using libapt-pkg-perl (as suggested in the TODO
item) rather than Dpkg::Version (as suggested by the comments in the
original module) as it should be more efficient, which is the object
of the exercise after all.  The only downside I can see is that it's
an additional dependency, but I don't think that's a huge issue -
it's not a particularly large package and its only dependencies are
basically guaranteed to be present already (perl, apt, libgcc1,
libstdc++6).

Yeah, it should be fine (although one of us should open an RT ticket
asking for it to be installed on gluck, since it isn't currently).

I poked weasel on IRC and availed myself of the fabulous "install while you wait" service. ;-)

I looked it over and it looks great, although could you also add a
test case to t/scripts?  Should be a pretty easy one to do with
Test::More.

Yep, added to the to-do list.

Adam
Reply to: