Re: Some more t/scripts tests
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 16:30 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 10:06 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> >> Attached mbox replaces the hacks with a more meaningful replacement.
> >
> > Sadly the needs-info-missing test breaks :-/
> >
> > t/scripts/needs-info-missing....ok 1/35#
> > # changelog already defined but values don't match:
> > # '' (Lintian/Collect/Source.pm) ne 'changelog-file'
>
> Does it really break? It should be a warning which is "fine" until the TODO
> in the test script is done.
Nope, you're right, sorry.
"All tests successful, 1 test skipped." The skipped test is the
pod-synopsis check, so the above is indeed just a warning.
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: