[let's try that again with the binutils version check the right way round *sigh*] On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 22:52 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 10:58 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > > I'd like to find some sneaky solution to #487746 that would suppress those > > errors on platforms with a broken binutils, though. > > Never one to resist the urge to tinker, I've come up with a (not so > sneaky) solution that munges the output of readelf in to something that > resembles the original objdump info - at least sufficiently for > lintian's uses. > > I've attached a copy of my updated collection/objdump-info; comments / > complaints welcome :) > > I may have missed some cases, but the checks are only invoked if objdump > -T fails and binutils 2.17 is installed, so it should be safe; I've > verified that the output of checking lib64stdc++6.4.2-dbg using the new > script on etch/i386 is the same as on sid/amd64. > > Adam
Attachment:
objdump-info
Description: Perl program