Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence)

To: Andrej Shadura <andrew@shadura.me>
Cc: Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org>, debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence)
From: Paul Jakma <paul@jakma.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 12:01:24 +0000 (GMT)
Message-id: <[🔎] alpine.LFD.2.21.1903201200470.4703@geneste>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CACujMDPZp4t+HQtto-niPfCo+FRZsFr=gEjPn83w=jmLT9iAzQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 20190316211457.jzh6j7iofsvz3aff@qor.donarmstrong.com> <[🔎] 20190317130838.GP722453@eidolon.nox.tf> <[🔎] 20190320002805.tox3icncjtt3cxxe@ebb.org> <[🔎] 20190320075749.GB112463@eidolon.nox.tf> <[🔎] CAHL7psF1+GSmMGqobhW28Ybo-tZyaySJcBSyOdW8cvTJYULV5g@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 874l7xzzj6.fsf@orrococo> <[🔎] alpine.LFD.2.21.1903201010500.4703@geneste> <[🔎] 87va0dygok.fsf@orrococo> <[🔎] alpine.LFD.2.21.1903201135180.4703@geneste> <[🔎] CACujMDPZp4t+HQtto-niPfCo+FRZsFr=gEjPn83w=jmLT9iAzQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, Andrej Shadura wrote:

You cannot terminate GPL granted to someone without a violation. Thereclearly is no violation in the case you’re describing. Your legaladvice is invalid.

I have legal advice, two independent sets, from qualified solicitorsthat there is a violation.


You're a software engineer.

regards,
--
Paul Jakma | paul@jakma.org | @pjakma | Key ID: 0xD86BF79464A2FF6A
Fortune:
Why are you so hard to ignore?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence)
  - From: Andrej Shadura <andrew@shadura.me>

References:
- Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence
  - From: Don Armstrong <don@debian.org>
- Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence
  - From: David Lamparter <equinox@diac24.net>
- no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence)
  - From: "Bradley M. Kuhn" <bkuhn@ebb.org>
- Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence)
  - From: David Lamparter <equinox@diac24.net>
- Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence)
  - From: Giacomo Tesio <giacomo@tesio.it>
- Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence)
  - From: Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org>
- Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence)
  - From: Paul Jakma <paul@jakma.org>
- Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence)
  - From: Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org>
- Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence)
  - From: Paul Jakma <paul@jakma.org>
- Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence)
  - From: Andrej Shadura <andrew@shadura.me>

Prev by Date: Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence)
Next by Date: Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence)
Previous by thread: Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence)
Next by thread: Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread