On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 22:43:09 +0200 Florian Weimer wrote: > * Paul Wise: > > > For your convenience, I have included a full copy of the mail below, > > which includes a justification section as well as full license terms. > > The license appears to be an unlicensed derivative work of the GPLv3, > which is not itself licensed under a permissive license. I'm not sure > if we can distribute the license text. If not, we can't distribute > the software itself, either. I think that this derivative work is permitted, since the [conditions] established by the FSF seem to be satisfied. [conditions]: <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#ModifyGPL> > > There is no definition what the triggering “services” actually are. > If it is sufficient to offer precompiled binaries for download, then > this license could contaminate the mirror network. This is possibly true and could by itself ban any SSPL-licensed work from the Debian archive... -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
Attachment:
pgpIrmDWsacGH.pgp
Description: PGP signature