[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: freeness and compatibility of CeCILL-C licence

On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 10:51 +0800, Drew Parsons wrote:
> If I'm reading that right, we can link it from BSD and LGPL
> libraries.
> Currently MUMPS is in Debian used by
> getfem++   LGPL
> petsc      BSD-2
> 	which is used by dolfin  LGPL
> trilinos   BSD
> code-aster GPL2
> So there should be no conflict using mumps with CeCILL-C, except
> perhaps with code-aster.

Graham Inggs wrote to me to say:

    Aster in Debian currently FTBFS and is unmaintained.  It is probably
    a good candidate for removal.


Reply to: