Re: freeness and compatibility of CeCILL-C licence
On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 10:51 +0800, Drew Parsons wrote:
> If I'm reading that right, we can link it from BSD and LGPL
> Currently MUMPS is in Debian used by
> getfem++ LGPL
> petsc BSD-2
> which is used by dolfin LGPL
> trilinos BSD
> code-aster GPL2
> So there should be no conflict using mumps with CeCILL-C, except
> perhaps with code-aster.
Graham Inggs wrote to me to say:
Aster in Debian currently FTBFS and is unmaintained. It is probably
a good candidate for removal.