[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

freeness and compatibility of CeCILL-C licence

There are various discussions about the status of the CeCILL-C licence
v1 (and other CeCILL licences) in the history of this mailing list. 
It's not listed at https://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/
but when it last came up on this list, Thibaut Paumard suggested it's
fine, LGPL compatible, 
Is this still the consensus?

The French scientific computing community have been been quite active,
with many packages released under CeCILL licences. If CeCILL-C is an
acceptable licence, should it (and the other CeCILLs) be added to 
https://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/ ?

CeCILL-C v1 itself is http://www.cecill.info/licences/Licence_CeCILL-C_V1-en.html

My interest is in MUMPS, http://mumps.enseeiht.fr/
whose latest version is licensed CeCILL-C v1.


Reply to: