freeness and compatibility of CeCILL-C licence
There are various discussions about the status of the CeCILL-C licence
v1 (and other CeCILL licences) in the history of this mailing list.
It's not listed at https://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/
but when it last came up on this list, Thibaut Paumard suggested it's
fine, LGPL compatible,
Is this still the consensus?
The French scientific computing community have been been quite active,
with many packages released under CeCILL licences. If CeCILL-C is an
acceptable licence, should it (and the other CeCILLs) be added to
CeCILL-C v1 itself is http://www.cecill.info/licences/Licence_CeCILL-C_V1-en.html
My interest is in MUMPS, http://mumps.enseeiht.fr/
whose latest version is licensed CeCILL-C v1.