debian-legal May 2015 by author

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

---

Ángel González

• Re: GPL "+" question May 31
• Re: GPL "+" question May 30

Ben Finney

• Re: gpuocelot / beignet license problem May 14
• Re: Upstream pointing to COPYING file in headers May 02

Charles Plessy

• Re: DFSG-ness of two May 30
• Re: DFSG-ness of two May 31
• Re: DFSG-ness of two May 31
• Re: GPL "+" question May 29

Eriberto Mota

• Re: Upstream pointing to COPYING file in headers May 02
• Upstream pointing to COPYING file in headers May 02
• Re: Upstream pointing to COPYING file in headers May 03

Francesco Poli

• Re: GPL "+" question May 29
• Re: DFSG-ness of two May 29
• Re: [Pkg-pascal-devel] DFSG-ness of two May 31
• Re: GPL "+" question May 31

Gabriele Giacone

• Re: Bug#785514: RFS: ming/1:0.4.7-1 [RC] May 19
• Re: Bug#785514: RFS: ming/1:0.4.7-1 [RC] May 18

Ian Jackson

• Re: GPL "+" question May 31

Josue Abarca

• Re: Upstream pointing to COPYING file in headers May 02

Maximilian

• Re: GPL "+" question May 29

Miriam Ruiz

• Re: GPL "+" question May 29

Ole Streicher

• Re: GPL "+" question May 29
• GPL "+" question May 29
• Re: GPL "+" question May 29
• Re: GPL "+" question May 30
• Re: GPL "+" question May 29
• Re: GPL "+" question May 29
• Re: GPL "+" question May 29
• Re: GPL "+" question May 29
• Re: GPL "+" question May 29

Paul Gevers

• Re: [Pkg-pascal-devel] DFSG-ness of two May 31
• DFSG-ness of two May 29
• Re: Re: DFSG-ness of two May 31

Paul R. Tagliamonte

• Re: GPL "+" question May 29
• Re: GPL "+" question May 29

Paul Tagliamonte

• Re: GPL "+" question May 31
• Re: GPL "+" question May 29
• Re: GPL "+" question May 29
• Re: GPL "+" question May 29
• Re: GPL "+" question May 29
• Re: GPL "+" question May 29
• Re: GPL "+" question May 29
• Re: GPL "+" question May 29

Paul Wise

• Re: License requiring US export law compliance May 20
• Re: License requiring US export law compliance May 19

Rebecca N. Palmer

• Re: gpuocelot / beignet license problem May 15
• Re: gpuocelot / beignet license problem May 14
• Re: License requiring US export law compliance May 19
• #729008: RFP: gpuocelot - can't be packaged for copyright reasons May 19

Riley Baird

• Re: DFSG-ness of two May 31
• Re: GPL "+" question May 29
• Re: DFSG-ness of two May 31
• Re: GPL "+" question May 29
• Re: License requiring US export law compliance May 20
• Re: DFSG-ness of two May 30
• Re: GPL "+" question May 30
• Re: GPL "+" question May 31
• Re: GPL "+" question May 29
• Re: DFSG-ness of two May 30
• Re: GPL "+" question May 30

Simon McVittie

• Re: GPL "+" question May 29

Steve Langasek

• Re: Upstream pointing to COPYING file in headers May 02

Ulrich Mueller

• Re: python-jsmin: evil or not? May 01

Vincent Cheng

• Re: Bug#785514: RFS: ming/1:0.4.7-1 [RC] May 19

[previous month]

[first page]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[last page]

[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]